The biological amplifier and the need for Interactive Course Modules to help teach electrical circuits
“When beauty is found in a mathematical derivation, it means
we are understanding and beginning to like the subject”
-Max E. Valentinuzzi
Chapter five talks about the biological amplifier. Sounds pretty exciting huh… well maybe more
exciting for the electronics engineer. In
college, the topic of electrical circuits was hardly my favorite subject in
introductory physics although I was able to get through it.
The amplifier is a relatively simple concept at first glance
because essentially, its application is used to make signals more detectable; although
interpreting circuit diagrams and quantifying their values can be such a headache! The math in chapter five made flipping each
page progressively heavier until eventually reaching the final paragraph where
Valentinuzzi shows concern for the reader who may be feeling “sick” after finishing
the chapter.
I believe Valentinuzzi is saying that simply reading the
text cannot furnish an understanding of math because he urges that “[p]ractice
and study are mandatory to fully master the subject”. Biomedical engineering is a challenging subject
to master because appreciation of the subject requires the ability to think
like an engineer and a scientist. This goes back to one of my original premises
from my third post, “What is bioengineering all about?”, that teaching biomedical
engineering presents a problem because instructors must demonstrate proficiency
in both math and science. Even as a science teacher, it was difficult
for me to follow Valentinuzzi’s equations; occasionally the math was just way over
my head! It’s uncommon for secondary
teachers to have endorsements in both math and science, and even when a teacher
has both, he or she maintains a preference for teaching one or the other. I believe however the rapid growth and demand for
biomedical engineering will eventually foster more quality programs in
secondary and post-secondary education.
Although until we see an abundance of biomedical engineering
programs in high school, STEM curriculums and innovative teaching will need to
pave the way for biomedical engineering.
Conceptualization of topics such as electrical circuits nonetheless are
abstract and often counterintuitive.
This presents another problem for secondary teachers and undergraduate
instructors because it complicates our ability to apply scaffolding techniques
in the classroom. For example, Galileo’s
famous Leaning Tower of Pisa Experiment is fun to replicate when demonstrating
the properties of mass and gravity; however, how do you model electrical circuits
in a way that can be structured to students’ understanding of electricity?
Perhaps a recent study by Omur Akdemir can shed light on
effective strategies to teach the topic of electrical circuits and other
abstract subjects. According to Akdemir,
physics and engineering students have a hard time learning about circuits. He demonstrates however that interactive course modules are conducive to students’ understanding of electrical circuits, more so than
teaching the same topic with traditional teaching tools (Akdemir, 2015). Similarly, I have implemented interactive
modules in my classroom lessons such as virtual
labs and online science games which
have proven effective for life science and sports medicine instruction in both
middle school and high school education.
Without interactive course modules, chapter five would have
been beyond the grasp of a biomedical engineering novice. As a recommendation for prospective future
editions of “Understanding the Human Machine – A Primer for Bioengineering”, I
believe the text would better serve the reader if the next edition came with a
supplemental practice problems notebook and perhaps even a companion website
with interactive modules. Furthermore,
interactive course modules show great potential for teaching abstract subjects
in secondary and post-secondary education.
References:
Akdemir, O. (2015). Using Interactive Course Modules to
Improve Students' Understanding of Electric Circuits. International
Journal of Engineering Education, 31(4), 1117-1125.
Comments
Post a Comment